13 January 2014

Ferguson Group works to help city move forward

 – As federal lobbyists go, Fort Wayne's seem low-key and laid-back.

 

They don't hang out on Capitol Hill. Their offices aren't along K Street. They are more likely to be consulting with engineering officials than with congressmen.

 

"Our part of the lobbying business is not like the Georgetown cocktail party lobbying," William Ferguson Jr. said. "It is really understanding the dynamics of stormwater. Understanding transportation issues. Understanding railway issues.

"We're not personalities like a lot of lobbyists are. Our specialty is local government," he said.

 

Ferguson is chairman and founder of The Ferguson Group, a consulting firm whose clients include about 130 municipal governments, including Cincinnati and Lansing, Mich.

Fort Wayne hired the firm this year for $90,000 a year.

Mayor Tom Henry's administration counts on The Ferguson Group "to navigate through some of the red tape among agencies and try to help them actually talk to each other on various issues that are affecting the city," said Stephanie Crandall, the city's business and legislative liaison.

"Sometimes the agencies don't always talk to each other to know what might be going on, either parallel or in opposition to the guidance that they might give local government," she said.

Crandall took part in a recent conference call conducted from Ferguson's office in Washington. Along with Karl Kalbacher, The Ferguson Group's director of grant services, they discussed local projects the lobbying firm is working on, including:

  • Converting the McMillen ice rink into a community center. The Ferguson Group is seeking federal grant money to help fund the conversion and operation of the center.
  • Trying to acquire, at no cost, the former Franklin school from the General Services Administration. The building would be demolished and the property turned into a park.
  • Relieving traffic congestion at the South Anthony Boulevard railroad crossing with a grade separation, such as an underpass for automobile lanes, which would be financed by federal funds.
  • Advocating for legislation sponsored by Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-3rd, that would prevent the Army Corps of Engineers from ordering the removal of all trees and bushes from earthen flood barriers across the nation.

Ferguson said Stutzman's amendment to the Water Resources Reform and Development Act, approved by the House in a nearly unanimous vote in October, would keep Fort Wayne from having to spend $25 million to tear out vegetation and rebuild its 10-mile levee system along the St. Marys, St. Joseph and Maumee rivers.

 

In other cases, The Ferguson Group is helping the city prepare to apply for federal funds.

 

"Sometimes projects aren't ready for that competitive grant," Kalbacher said, mentioning the South Anthony Boulevard grade separation. "They need to get to the next stage.

 

"Preping these sites and working together … to get us to that point is critical," he said.

'All kinds of stuff'

 

Ferguson and Kalbacher plan to travel to Fort Wayne this month to meet with officials of the departments they represent: community development, public works, utilities and parks.

 

The lobbyists talk twice a month by phone with city personnel.

 

"We need to know the projects," Ferguson said.

 

Kalbacher said municipal governments "are busy doing all kinds of stuff: picking up the garbage, policing the streets, making sure the sewers are cleaned out. Their focus shouldn't be on Washington, D.C. We can help them in that regard."

 

The Fort Wayne government for many years had retained B&D Consulting Inc. as its lobbyist.

 

City spokesman John Perlich said in an email that the Hagerstown, Md., company "provided great service to the city in meeting our legislative lobbying goals (and) lobbying members of Congress."

 

But as municipal lobbying efforts shifted from Congress to executive-branch agencies, "we found that The Ferguson Group offered a level of expertise and regulatory experience that was in line with our federal advocacy needs," Perlich said.

 

That shift coincided with Congress' decision to eliminate earmarks, the process of authorizing federal funds to projects in lawmakers' home states or districts.

 

"We do as much or more grant work than we did in the earmark era," Ferguson said. "There's more money in grants than there was in earmarks."

 

Other clients

William Ferguson has been a lobbyist since the mid-1970s and founded his namesake firm in 1982. It is in an office building along Connecticut Avenue Northwest, across the street from the historic Mayflower Hotel and a couple blocks north of K Street, a hotbed of lobbying firms.

 

Ferguson arrived in town from Massachusetts to work for Rep. Paul Tsongas, a Bay State Democrat who was newly elected to House and would serve later in the Senate.

 

"I was a hippie when I came to Washington. I had a ponytail, and I didn't own a suit," Ferguson recalled. He joined the National Center for Municipal Development. His first client, the city of Englewood, Calif., remains with him.

 

The Ferguson Group has received lobbying income of $5.2 million this year, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. By comparison, the center lists 11 firms that have earned at least $10 million this year, topped by Patton Boggs' nearly $30.2 million.

 

In addition to municipal governments, clients of The Ferguson Group have included the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, California State University and the Magic Johnson Foundation, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The firm has more than 20 staff members.

 

Various pages of The Ferguson Group's website list the firm's accomplishments: $34 million in transportation projects for King County, Wash., and grants of $5.6 million for Dubuque, Iowa, and $3.8 million for Wyandotte, Mich.

 

Kalbacher has been with The Ferguson Group for about a year. A geologist, he previously worked in environmental and economic development positions for governments in Delaware and Maryland and is a former city councilman.

 

"My mindset is local government, it's not lobbying," Kalbacher said. "My view of lobbying is providing information and advice, counsel. … Local government at the beginning of the day and at the end of the day (is) about providing services."

 

The Ferguson Group's efforts are "a way of affecting the well-being of people around the country," Ferguson said.

"I really feel like I am working for the citizens of Fort Wayne," he added.

 

http://journalgazette.com/article/20131201/LOCAL/312019934

Print

Overview

The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) serves as the primary vehicle through which Congress authorizes U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works projects and establishes policy frameworks for water resource development nationwide. Enacted on a biennial schedule, WRDAs provide congressional authorization for USACE to conduct feasibility studies, construct flood risk reduction projects, improve navigation infrastructure, restore aquatic ecosystems, and assist with environmental infrastructure development.
Since the enactment of WRDA 1986, Congress has used these omnibus authorization bills to both create new USACE authorities and refine existing programs based on evolving national priorities and lessons learned from program implementation. Recent WRDAs have addressed critical issues including drought resilience, water supply development, infrastructure modernization, and support for economically disadvantaged communities.
The most recent legislation, the Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (WRDA 2024, P.L. 118-272), continued Congress's bipartisan commitment to strengthening America's water infrastructure by authorizing new construction projects, modifying existing authorities, and establishing updated policy guidance for USACE operations. WRDA 2024 also authorized five new regional environmental infrastructure programs, each incorporating flexible delivery mechanisms that allow federal assistance to be provided through grants or reimbursements to nonfederal sponsors.
Authorization through WRDA is typically a prerequisite for USACE activities to receive federal appropriations through the annual Energy and Water Development appropriations process. This two-step framework—authorization followed by appropriation—ensures congressional oversight of both program scope and funding levels.
Section 219 of WRDA 1992, as amended, represents one of USACE's most geographically expansive environmental infrastructure assistance authorities. Originally enacted to authorize design assistance for 18 specific projects, Section 219 has been amended by subsequent Congresses to authorize both design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure in hundreds of municipalities, counties, and states across the nation.
The Congressional Research Service has identified over 600 environmental infrastructure assistance authorities with cumulative authorizations of appropriations totaling approximately $18.1 billion. Section 219 authorities constitute the majority of these geographically specific project authorizations, covering at least 46 states, the District of Columbia, and four U.S. territories.
Section 219 projects address critical community needs including wastewater treatment facilities, water supply and distribution systems, stormwater management infrastructure, surface water protection, and environmental restoration. These projects support public health, environmental quality, and economic development in communities that have secured congressional authorization for USACE assistance.
Congress has continued to expand Section 219 in recent legislation. WRDA 2022 added 132 new Section 219 authorities and amended 24 existing authorities. WRDA 2024 authorized an additional 193 new Section 219 authorities and amended 53 existing authorities, providing a combined $5.4 billion increase in authorization of appropriations. WRDA 2024 also established a seven-year pilot program to increase the federal cost share from 75 percent to 90 percent for Section 219 projects benefiting economically disadvantaged communities.
Unlike traditional USACE water resource projects, Section 219 assistance does not require completion of the agency's standard feasibility study process. However, projects receiving Section 219 assistance must comply with applicable federal environmental laws, including the National Environmental Policy Act.
«January 2026»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
2930311234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678

US Congressional Calendar

9 December 2024

TFG Presents 2025 Congressional Calendar

The Ferguson Group (TFG) compiled a 2025 Congressional Calendar with session and recess dates for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate 119th congressional session. 

Latest TFG News

A Message from Roger Gwinn on the Passing of Congressman Doug LaMalfa 7 January 2026

A Message from Roger Gwinn on the Passing of Congressman Doug LaMalfa

WASHINGTON, D.C. – TFG CEO, Roger Gwinn, released the following statement regarding the passing of Congressman Doug LaMalfa.

Meet a Team Member

Nicole Sibilski

Nicole Sibilski

Senior Grants Specialist

Latest Coronavirus Updates